[Bell Historians] Riverside bass bell

[David Willis]

It certainly prooves to me that biggest is not best . No musical
merit whatsoever .
 
DCW

--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Richard Offen <richard.offen at Z0WG334wzyuk65JxWr87qHKPz91WVSD6TlcsT1ex6maGvtW9fklBFI2cY-Qo5Qz9VRGl31Ho3lWQBkqXuJla_3XM77vV.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

From: Richard Offen <richard.offen at Z0WG334wzyuk65JxWr87qHKPz91WVSD6TlcsT1ex6maGvtW9fklBFI2cY-Qo5Qz9VRGl31Ho3lWQBkqXuJla_3XM77vV.yahoo.invalid>
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Riverside bass bell
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 3:54 PM








Yes, a somewhat liquid dinner with friends is what went wrong!   I meant 'bollock, and, of course, dear Microsoft, bless its little cotton socks corrected it to what it thought I’d intended to say'!!!!!
 
R
 
-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians@ yahoogroups. com [mailto: bellhistorians@ yahoogroups. com ] On Behalf Of John Camp
Sent: Thursday, 9 October 2008 10:50 PM
To: bellhistorians@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Riverside bass bell
 
At 15:44 on 09 October 2008, Richard Offen wrote:
 
> The Newark one sounds marginally better, but, in the words of the late,
> great Bill Theobald, they both "sound like a cow's arse being hit with a wet
> bullock!"
 
Something a bit wrong there, surely?
 
John Camp
 
 
------------ --------- --------- ------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com 
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1715 - Release Date: 10/8/2008 7:19 PM 














                 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081009/56fbc13c/attachment.html>