Listed bell at Brighton

[George Dawson]

It seems to be a mistake. At Preston the i/b has been retained & is on the
'Lists of bells.', None of the G&J ring are.

G

 

 

 

 

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Willis
Sent: 20 October 2008 22:31
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Listed bell at Brighton

 


The spreadsheet seems to indicate that its the 1440 bell by

W Chamberlain thats listed , not one of the 3 .

The weight of the 2nd could be an estimate ?

 

David

--- On Mon, 10/20/08, David Bryant <davidbryant at vTTmIrazV_SxOdRTOv1PdJ4iz6SKnwt7I8okiOY8qoI8b5sHtzo1gpbHinM0JC6PNqydFu6djoBFNDsBM7REkfjx.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

From: David Bryant <davidbryant at vTTmIrazV_SxOdRTOv1PdJ4iz6SKnwt7I8okiOY8qoI8b5sHtzo1gpbHinM0JC6PNqydFu6djoBFNDsBM7REkfjx.yahoo.invalid>
Subject: [Bell Historians] Listed bell
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 10:07 PM

Why?s the 2nd of this three listed, then? Can?t see any obvious reason why
one out of a set of three would be listed.

 

http://www.dove. cccbr.org. uk/detail. php?DoveID= BRIGHTONPK
<http://www.dove.cccbr.org.uk/detail.php?DoveID=BRIGHTONPK> 

 

David

_,___ 

           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081021/3f60364d/attachment.html>