Listed bell at Brighton

[John Baldwin]

Thanks - noted.
 
John

-----Original Message-----
From: George Dawson [mailto:george at oqsKKkb1hdzWdF7ci-0oLEmCSW-eHY5wTtX6VKTRZThEkNgiuTTrjPXV95LmjQEVeYvtwEZoU-iiwFsuvnD2EtnFZIgjUo9j.yahoo.invalid] 
Sent: 21 October 2008 08:24
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Cc: Dovemaster at nV_vBSuXq1n0suAsndOfhMuCbiWr72M0Qbhsu6d5Zmgnz0Tr_8oTXB4KHvoMsUb4LuqC0fuYrPmfAcYQw_hnvglu.yahoo.invalid; 'David Knight'
Subject: Listed bell at Brighton



It seems to be a mistake. At Preston the i/b has been retained & is on
the 'Lists of bells.', None of the G&J ring are.

G

 

 

 

 

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Willis
Sent: 20 October 2008 22:31
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Listed bell at Brighton

 


The spreadsheet seems to indicate that its the 1440 bell by

W Chamberlain thats listed , not one of the 3 .

The weight of the 2nd could be an estimate ?

 

David

--- On Mon, 10/20/08, David Bryant <davidbryant at 2NwCxHLrMtfscoKttvpE0k3r0JiqAg2hDUbd895AjUZ_X34Zexp2uFoHpYHudtnHN_911IhV-H2TZQFlLfmsnWvr.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

From: David Bryant <davidbryant at 2NwCxHLrMtfscoKttvpE0k3r0JiqAg2hDUbd895AjUZ_X34Zexp2uFoHpYHudtnHN_911IhV-H2TZQFlLfmsnWvr.yahoo.invalid>
Subject: [Bell Historians] Listed bell
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, October 20, 2008, 10:07 PM

Why?s the 2nd of this three listed, then? Can?t see any obvious reason
why one out of a set of three would be listed.

 

http://www.dove. cccbr.org. uk/detail. php?DoveID=
<http://www.dove.cccbr.org.uk/detail.php?DoveID=BRIGHTONPK> BRIGHTONPK

 

David

_,___ 

           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081021/5b4c80c7/attachment.html>