[Bell Historians] Guildford Cathedral
Bickerton, Roderic (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Roderic.Bickerton at c9FGBsMoGo1sQF-ATP1PlGHblNTceYQilfivgv4pQl3QMprMUcydFjyuTwke2Yh65zJNJpghJFRudlCuSrNuG7Dp5b4hTi9uKA.yahoo.invalid
Tue Jan 6 15:17:24 GMT 2009
I personally do not much like large rope circles, and cannot really
detect modest rope draw.
Radial frames use large spaces well, but are difficult to modify if
extra bells are installed.
o/k the hole in the middle will take the odd extra sharp or flat if it
is not filled with a Bordon.
I was told they would like to augment Washington but could not do it
without major engineering changes, more than could be justified.
________________________________
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Higson
Sent: 06 January 2009 14:54
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Guildford Cathedral
*** WARNING ***
This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
You could say the same about Hereford.
Isn't it more likely that the frame was spread out to fill the copious
amounts of room so that there wasn't the need to do much drawing of the
ropes?
I've seen a few M&S frame with similar holes in the middle where there
isn't any chance that a tenor would ever be added.
Andrew Higson
Taylors Eayre and Smith Ltd
The Bellfoundry
Freehold Street
Loughborough
LE11 1AR
Telephone: 01509 212241 Fax: 01509 263305 Registered in England No.
1352309
________________________________
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of David Bryant
Sent: 06 January 2009 14:42
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Guildford Cathedral
"The first thing to strike me was the large unused "pit" in the centre.
Was it origialaly intended to add in a bourdon bell at some point,
perhaps?"
It looks to me like it's designed for the addition of a heavier tenor.
Wasn't there some discussion when they were first installed about having
a ring with a 50cwt tenor? Was the frame designed so that a heavier
tenor (presumably 40cwt-ish in C) could be added later if desired?
Anyone know?
David
SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL
A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20090106/c2033b88/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list