[Bell Historians] Great Malvern
richard at 8rXFokhoaowSz8Wj-RJlA1ew7BX2XBZI4eA4Buf0PbsoZSiQWNkMVFqfL4wGpBwi99mS3qDdzt6eu2LRiPGl.yahoo.invalid
Tue Mar 10 08:51:59 GMT 2009
Perhaps I am being naive here, but can people explain exactly where they
feel the Chancellor went wrong? Was the problem in the evidence
submitted or the logic applied by the Chancellor, or both?
More information about the Bell-historians