[Bell Historians] Great Malvern

Richard Grimmett richard at 8rXFokhoaowSz8Wj-RJlA1ew7BX2XBZI4eA4Buf0PbsoZSiQWNkMVFqfL4wGpBwi99mS3qDdzt6eu2LRiPGl.yahoo.invalid
Tue Mar 10 08:51:59 GMT 2009

Perhaps I am being naive here, but can people explain exactly where they 
feel the Chancellor went wrong?  Was the problem in the evidence 
submitted or the logic applied by the Chancellor, or both?



More information about the Bell-historians mailing list