RE: RE: Re: [Bell Historians] Great Malvern

[Mark Regan]

I know - it be good to hear their views on the Chancellor's ruling.

Mark

>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: "John H Allen" <john at QnbMZ4jgAKeQF1D3n3E3Bo4F07vblML7uQJlX9PgWU5JYNoW7T3YAMSQNzW7fZ0gb0FyP9oHbSugrPn1cw.yahoo.invalid>
>To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:34:50
>
>Mark,
>
> 
>
>If you read the Report you will see what DB and CP
>said.
>
> 
>
>John
>
> 
>
> 
>
>  _____  
>
>From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
>[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
>On Behalf Of Mark Regan
>Sent: 10 March 2009 13:28
>To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
>Subject: RE: Re: [Bell Historians] Great Malvern
>
> 
>
>All the Chancellor has done is assess the evidence.
>
>
>And this should never have gone to Court. That EH,
>the CBC and the DAC could
>not find a way to support Malvern Priory's PCC and
>ringers is disappointing.
>
>
>It would be interesting to hear of the
>contributions and advice of David
>Beacham (DAC) and Chris Povey (CCCBR) who were at
>the hearing.
>
>Mark
>
>Mark Regan
>22 Sebright Avenue
>Worcester
>WR5 2HH
>01905 354339
>07971 573688
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1991 -
>Release Date: 03/10/09
>07:19:00


Mark Regan
22 Sebright Avenue
Worcester
WR5 2HH
01905 354339
07971 573688