[Bell Historians] Great Malvern Priory - Passing Information on....
camp at u-DwvZAhmLf1B-GM1qdbuJuyplhfo2XAgwOLKT0WOPv433rB21xdR5AO0rWsO_I0GHNYb-L-MSqpGQ.yahoo.invalid
Wed Mar 11 19:05:17 GMT 2009
At 16:33 on 11 March 2009, Richard Grimmett wrote:
> This issue of confidentiality is illogical. Are all new members vetted
> by all existing ones? Are existing ones informed everytime someone new
> joins? Is the JEC column in the RW approved by all subscribers? Of
> course not!!
Well - the person who wrote to David expressing reservations was me.
I'm not talking about confidentiality, or copyright, or any other
enforceable consideration. Personally, I think it is common courtesy,
if you are going to make unexpected use of someone else's comments
sent to a private list, to ask first, if you can.
Ringing-chat carries a message, received by all members when they
join, expressly pointing out that material may be used in my RW
column. On every other list which I use for the column, there has
been a message saying the same thing at some stage. OK - members come
and go, but most people are aware that their contributions may be
used. The NRT list has asked that I do not identify people by name,
so I don't. Nor do I usually identify people on the FODS list.
Some lists have public archives (ringing-theory, for example).
Others, including this list, have private archives. Messages are
clearly not in the public domain, in these circumstances.
More information about the Bell-historians