[Bell Historians] Cornhill, was Trafalgar Square old & new
richard.offen at WeKO5vZ6hpHpli__kej9QejdL3M7dnnxmSAzMziN2s1i11u3WMue6JuEcgclFhJt87tqxqQ4hxAoyDIkuCuuFHo.yahoo.invalid
Thu Mar 12 09:02:47 GMT 2009
Absolutely no offence taken.
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Wilby
Sent: Thursday, 12 March 2009 4:43 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Cornhill, was Trafalgar Square old & new
Sorry Richard, that was not meant to be directed at you: my views on the
thread just happened to follow from your message.
I find it rather incongruous that the debate is lamenting the loss of a poor
ring of unremarkable bells while another running thread is complaining that
a poor frame with no merit cannot now be replaced.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.10/1996 - Release Date: 03/11/09
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bell-historians