[Bell Historians] Cornhill, was Trafalgar Square old & new

Richard Offen richard.offen at WeKO5vZ6hpHpli__kej9QejdL3M7dnnxmSAzMziN2s1i11u3WMue6JuEcgclFhJt87tqxqQ4hxAoyDIkuCuuFHo.yahoo.invalid
Thu Mar 12 09:02:47 GMT 2009

Absolutely no offence taken.





From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Wilby
Sent: Thursday, 12 March 2009 4:43 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Cornhill, was Trafalgar Square old & new


Sorry Richard, that was not meant to be directed at you: my views on the
thread just happened to follow from your message.

I find it rather incongruous that the debate is lamenting the loss of a poor
ring of unremarkable bells while another running thread is complaining that
a poor frame with no merit cannot now be replaced.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.10/1996 - Release Date: 03/11/09

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20090312/3c36926a/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list