[Bell Historians] Hanley Stoke on Trent

Tue May 19 16:36:48 BST 2009

I would be surprised if there is a problem with the Faculty applications
unless EH wants to keep the old frame!

The bigger problem may be the LBC from Stoke City Council who have given
this once but with the proviso that the roof of the tower, already rotted
away, must be replaced when the bells are removed (at the expense of the
Church).

John

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Bickerton, Roderic (SELEX GALILEO, UK)
Sent: 19 May 2009 16:32
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Hanley Stoke on Trent

Really good news, lets prey that EH do not go heavy on the Stone
application.
They are a more important case than Malvern, in some ways.
The fact the back 6 are a complete AR 1 ring of 1710 will not help
(assuming pNBR is accurate) even if the resultant sound is poor, by any
standard.
One hopes the faculty application is really well reasoned and as
convincing as it possibly can be.

SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex
SS14 3EL
A company registered in England & Wales. Company no. 02426132
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.34/2121 - Release Date: 05/18/09
17:55:00

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20090519/0636d645/attachment.html>