[Bell Historians] Bell restoration/tuning
richard.offen at a9gAgUyZ3CpjPMqINZukTNUPVFFgpJFaTlcGzfzY-QdFQAtjDKoIFrDnUFG-Dv46ed72KvNDcJYpUSqmHsuhQ0jS.yahoo.invalid
Fri Oct 16 13:00:24 BST 2009
One of David's favourite arguments when arguing for the retention of old
bell frames and fittings is that organists are generally very happy with
period tracker actions when restored .which both you and I know is a totally
different kettle of fish, but David doesn't ring so he simply doesn't
understand how ridiculous this stance is!
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Humpers
Sent: Friday, 16 October 2009 5:21 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Fwd: [Bell Historians] Bell restoration/tuning
I knew David as a (rather dull) musicologist, with interests in organs
in particular. He has been working for one of the conservation
bodies, but so far as I know has no formal trained knowledge of bells
2009/10/15 jimhedgcock <jameshedgcock@ <mailto:jameshedgcock%40hotmail.com>
> Can anyone tell me the authority with which a certain Dr. David Knight
speaks on these matters?
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2439 - Release Date: 10/15/09
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bell-historians