[SPAM] Re: [Bell Historians] Hanley Stoke on Trent

John H Allen john at n70LJh3-fpCgQUpeNbHvKl7JznD5M6NOjNxWg-YW3VgXraZ3SbfMeVbSSXljIpoY54nDPaKTpWxtCiTl.yahoo.invalid
Fri Oct 16 16:14:15 BST 2009


For some reason the group's spam filter didn't like this email - hence the delay!

David
--------------------------------------------------------------------




Long since removed and dealt with by Bishop's Directions/

 

 

  _____  

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Alan Buswell
Sent: Friday 16 October 2009 11:35
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: [Bell Historians] Hanley Stoke on Trent

 

  

What is happening to the fixtures in the church? i.e the silver and other
valuables etc.

AAJB

----- Original Message ----- 

From: David <mailto:davidbryant at oMskudSLmgI3ctLg_PVEHaLzNXnn_xq1XQnaodc4TAXopSLLBWkR0UNJ_Cqjb5ZS6cfgzmaxYBe8ZAbBnFbg.yahoo.invalid>  Bryant 

To: bellhistorians@ <mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:04 PM

Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Bell Historians] Hanley Stoke on Trent

 

  

"What further arguments would members of this list put forward to justify
the removal of bells from a redundant church building intended for secular
use?"

 

I haven't read all of the documentation yet, but has anyone located
surviving relatives of those who the bells commemorate, and asked for their
opinion?

 

David



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.20/2440 - Release Date: 10/16/09
06:32:00


           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20091016/6a00aa76/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list