[Bell Historians] Whitechapel charges
David Cawley
davidl.cawley at HU5BuFqkyN0rOiF1AMYgchLjUP8Dja7WV7VBP3IUANvSSbsYD2Ane7GSa-vahv1s_eaqIoh0JO-wmpLYKg6wAnihuWU.yahoo.invalid
Fri Mar 19 19:10:23 GMT 2010
Perhaps you could offer them the old steel bells :)
D
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Grimmett
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Whitechapel charges
Peter Trent wrote:
> The Churchwarden of most recent project that I have had dealings
> with deliberately chose Whitechapel because they felt that by paying
> them for a professional service it showed a serious enquiry on their
> part, of what is just an initial investigation as to the feasibility of
> funding a restoration and not just using the free service and good
> nature of the other firms... even though he was supplied with all the
> names and contact details
> PJT
Our case is different. We are very definitely proceeding. Even already
procured the back three of a new ring of 10. We want a new frame,
fittings and a front 7! Its definite business, not an initial
investigation.
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100319/20686027/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list