[Bell Historians] Whitechapel charges

[matthewhigby at 8jKd43ABbAk7jIgUYiwRhA1crGAmuU2oK4XoepoYnSbOOAyb6XPcS0x10ywCI-U2dDA6OISoYEbTbK8.yahoo.invalid]

Me again :-)

You may give the job to another firm, who could cast the bells themselves or get the bells cast elsewhere. Not definite business for Whitechapel.

Cheers,

M


Our case is different. We are very definitely proceeding. Even already 
procured the back three of a new ring of 10. We want a new frame, 
fittings and a front 7! Its definite business, not an initial 
investigation.







-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Grimmett <richard at YjATY57pmFGMHsJd9i2U5GQB-ym9ZJ1vQGqQZwtexX5NYPLMzvpAFI1Cvx-etQcfLY9TvZfTI82YxTYejw.yahoo.invalid>
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, Mar 19, 2010 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Whitechapel charges


 

Peter Trent wrote:
> The Churchwarden of most recent project that I have had dealings 
> with deliberately chose Whitechapel because they felt that by paying 
> them for a professional service it showed a serious enquiry on their 
> part, of what is just an initial investigation as to the feasibility of 
> funding a restoration and not just using the free service and good 
> nature of the other firms... even though he was supplied with all the 
> names and contact details
> PJT

Our case is different. We are very definitely proceeding. Even already 
procured the back three of a new ring of 10. We want a new frame, 
fittings and a front 7! Its definite business, not an initial 
investigation.

Richard




           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100319/14578535/attachment.html>