[Bell Historians] Cornhill Judgement

Peter Rivet peter at thx8drFBIMmP-iQh2JS_97sJ7TiVR3H2SvlYtReImPDGP57IBqiw9wvb-UiVMN4RiloWiNnAnOJFA4dP.yahoo.invalid
Fri Sep 10 17:17:13 BST 2010


I can only agree - it makes it look as if firm A is trying to protect its
traditional territory.

Peter Rivet

"One disturbing thing is that "A" firm quoted to replace the ring and and
have no objections, but when a contract is awarded to rival firm "B", then a
Director of firm "A" raises objections in a public manner-That is not good
publicity for the bell founding/hanging trade."
           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100910/406688dd/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list