[Bell Historians] Re: Netiquette

[David Willis]

--- On Tue, 14/9/10, fartwell2000 <alanjbirney at oFYGU6KmUXl5XYxp0Ta_lYO2hwQhfsvJlYnq85GmLKrmcKw9m8dRVPp3l1uvpKmQpRkK5jdCrNHhBAG7CdSFNro.yahoo.invalid> quoted
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Dickon Love" <dickon at ...> wrote:
Please may I remind people that they shouldn't be top posting on this site.
Seems to have fallen of deaf ears-in the last block of mesages I read, responses were all over the place :-)

Perhaps
 a fine could be imposed for top posting and all the proceeds would be 
most welcome for the Barnoldswick augmentation fund!

Alan




As the last person to top post I would point suggest that it is up to each contributor to bottom post. I started a thread by quoting the RW editor and posting beneath. The following contributor posted on top and it seemed logical for my reply to be adjacent.

I anticipate that Dickon would prefer to see postings nice and tidy and therefore further point out that your posting above is far more tidy than received.

Note also that my postings are clean of the bits and pieces that are often remaining 
at the end of this lists postings.

I hope your augmentation fund is over subscribed

Sorry if this treads on your moderatorial ? toes Dickon.

David



                 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20100914/6149b144/attachment.html>