[Bell Historians] Moulding wires - pattern encoding
Carl Scott Zimmerman
csz_stl at FQJm9pXEypUR_BqYdACBDQUFwXw0kv_1StAdvrpMLWJ2LOAzJGwQ39zRVoCCSdAa290wVQVpN0hwkw.yahoo.invalid
Mon Jan 17 22:15:03 GMT 2011
Thanks, Richard.
This descriptive method seems to need place holders for instances
where no moulding wires are present. Thus bells made during the last
30+ years of the Henry Stuckstede Bell Foundry Co. might be described
as 0,0,1-0. Or would 0,,1-0 suffice?
Does this method apply to all (or most) British-made bells of the
past century or two? I ask because it would not apply to the work of
several 19th-c. American bellfounders, for various reasons other than
a total absence of moulding wires. (Sorry, I don't have any
illustrations online yet.)
Carl
_____
At 05:52 +0800 2011/01/12, Richard Offen wrote:
>The description starts at the crown of the bell, so 3,2-3,3-2 would
>indicate three wires on the crown of the bell, two above the
>inscription band and three below, three where the sound bow begins
>to curve out and two at the lip.
>
>There are infinite variations on this, for instance the usual
>configuration on a modern Whitechapel bell is 3,2-2,3-2.
>
>Hope this helps.
_____
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list