[Bell Historians] Re: Historical differences between long-standing bell foundries?

[matthewhigby at NHhZy3N2BBFZqeSel6YrCP7HroMj9CpwtUZOkZay3kE7AeKW3KrGnkNBtOQ9BU5RypAHncL_DWRJxkz6wFYu.yahoo.invalid]

Actually that has got me thinking... What do you have to do to become a bellfoundry?? I assumed you had to cast at least one bell. Matt H
Sent using BlackBerry® from Orange

-----Original Message-----
From: Hayden Charles <hcharles at nildram.co.uk>
Sender: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:28:25 
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Re: Historical differences between long-standing
 bell foundries?

richard at grimmett.org wrote on 27/04/2012 16:33:
>
> The Southwark bell was not cast using traditional methods or at a
> bellfoundry.
>
> Richard

I am not aware that anyone was claiming otherwise.

Hayden Charles

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20120428/91c923aa/attachment.html>