[Bell Historians] Olympics

Richard Offen richard.offen at D6jazkBRDveX8h3manHIcb8hPbN60s-B_iMCY6Jngs0cG0d9Cfg2aoJGq9IXMSHGFxYAoE9eiNOng7pYjCV-O_Ho11s.yahoo.invalid
Wed Feb 8 15:20:29 GMT 2012

It amounts to the same thing doesn't it?  They cannot tell us any detail.




From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of John Camp
Sent: Wednesday, 8 February 2012 11:16 PM
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Olympics



At 14:58 on 08 February 2012, Richard Offen wrote:

> As has been said already, the manufacturer has been sworn to secrecy
> on ALL aspects of the project.

How do you know? Or have you been given information in breach of the

I doubt, anyway, whether there is any question of being "sworn to
secrecy". There may well be a contractual term which requires


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20120208/99b1a406/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list