[Bell Historians] CBC

[Peter Rivet]

I think it would be hard to justify not allowing SPAB the opportunity to
argue their case.  The important point is making sure that they aren't the
only interest group represented, and don't have a veto.

Peter Rivet

  -----Original Message-----
  From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Robert Lewis
  Sent: 11 October 2013 15:29
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] CBC



  At 14:55 11/10/2013, Mattew wrote:



    Try this Mike.
http://www.churchcare.co.uk/about-us/cathedra-and-church-buildings-division/
statutory-bodies/conservation-committees


  I wonder what the justification is for giving SPAB a seat at this
particular table.

  RAL




  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20131011/f2f453e4/attachment.html>