[Bell Historians] Tower Classification required

[R Johnston R.Johnston@bristol.ac.uk [bellhistorians]]

Is there an important difference between towers in a building that was
originally a place of worship and those with bells that were never part of
such a building?

Professor RON JOHNSTON, FAcSS, FBA, OBE
School of Geographical Sciences
University of Bristol
Bristol BS8 1SS
+44(0)117 928 9116
R.Johnston at bristol.ac.uk
http://www.bris.ac.uk/geography/people/ron-j-johnston
https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=QQoOCYsAAAAJ&hl=en
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/ron-johnston/
user=QQoOCYsAAAAJ&hl=en


On 14 April 2016 at 11:47, John Camp camp at bellringers.org [bellhistorians] <
bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
>
> At 11:38 on 14 April 2016, alan Buswell aaj.buswell at gmail.com
> [bellhistorians] wrote:
>
> > As JC says, it all depends on what you mean by secular. I was
> > asking everyone what they meant by the word. If a church is held in
> > trust and has say, three services during the year - is this secular?
> > It does not come under any Diocesan jurisdiction.
>
> Nor does Westminster Abbey.
>
> John Camp
>
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20160414/6f8baa60/attachment.html>