[Bell Historians] Tower Classification required
John Camp camp@bellringers.org [bellhistorians]
bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Thu Apr 14 21:52:52 BST 2016
At 11:58 on 14 April 2016, R Johnston R.Johnston at bristol.ac.uk [bellhistorians] wrote:
> Is there an important difference between towers in a building that
> was originally a place of worship and those with bells that were
> never part of such a building?
It's important if you think it's important. Back to what Chris P was
saying: what is the purpose of the classification?
Having said that, I don't myself see any significant difference, in
terms of secularity, between Carfax tower and Manchester Town Hall.
John Camp
------------------------------------
Posted by: John Camp <john at camp.uk.net>
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
bellhistorians-digest at yahoogroups.com
bellhistorians-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list