[Bell Historians] Tower Classification required

John Camp camp@bellringers.org [bellhistorians] bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Thu Apr 14 21:52:52 BST 2016


At 11:58 on 14 April 2016, R Johnston R.Johnston at bristol.ac.uk [bellhistorians] wrote:

> Is there an important difference between towers in a building that
> was originally a place of worship and those with bells that were
> never part of such a building?

It's important if you think it's important.  Back to what Chris P was
saying:  what is the purpose of the classification?

Having said that, I don't myself see any significant difference, in
terms of secularity, between Carfax tower and Manchester Town Hall.

John Camp



------------------------------------
Posted by: John Camp <john at camp.uk.net>
------------------------------------


------------------------------------

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    bellhistorians-digest at yahoogroups.com 
    bellhistorians-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/




More information about the Bell-historians mailing list