[Bell Historians] How would you reply ?

[alan Buswell aaj.buswell@gmail.com [bellhistorians]]

There does not seem to be much wrong with Middlezoy. Two quarters have been
published in the RW this year. See pp159 & 607. Total since 1972 - 68.

AAJB.

On 15 July 2018 at 23:37, Nick Bowden nickwbowden at talktalk.net
[bellhistorians] <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com> wrote:

>
> [Attachment(s) <#m_-4921604426714612821_TopText> from Nick Bowden
> included below]
>
> It may be this one...
> https://bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=1238513
>
>
>
> Regards, Nick
>
>
>
> *From: *Richard Offen richard.offen at iinet.net.au [bellhistorians]
> <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent: *15 July 2018 23:34
> *To: *bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> *Subject: *Re: [Bell Historians] How would you reply ?
>
>
>
>
>
> Apart from now not existing, it has never been the role of the Towers and
> Belfries Committee to check the safety of all rings of bells in the UK;
> they were only ever involved when invited to do so by local ringers or
> church authorities.
>
>
>
> I suspect the letter is either a hoax, grossly exaggerated, or written by
> someone not quite in their right mind at the time of authorship.
>
>
>
> Richard
>
> Sent from Richard Offen's iPad
>
>
> On 16 Jul 2018, at 5:17 am, mikechester at hotmail.com [bellhistorians] <
> bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I find it difficult to believe that a bell could be rung if the frame
> moved that much.
>
>
>
> Whatever, I find it appalling that he has used this "event" to attack the
> CCCBR Towers and Belfries Committee, which actually doesn't exist as such
> any more, and I have written to the RW to say so,
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20180716/aae020f3/attachment.html>