[Bell Historians] Pages from RW editions

[bill at hibberts.co.uk]

I have been provided with further clarification and I now understand what
are the correct pages for each edition. I had assumed that the pages in the
bellboard PDFs were a scanning error, I now realise the error is in the
printed copies, to which respondents were referring. Sorry for the
misunderstanding.

 

Regards,

 

Bill H

 

From: bill at hibberts.co.uk <bill at hibberts.co.uk> 
Sent: 23 July 2023 21:31
To: 'bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk'
<bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Pages from RW editions

 

Thanks to all who replied to this. Unfortunately I infer from the replies
that they were based on the copies on bellboard (or maybe the CCCBR CD), not
actual printed copies. The data in bellboard is wrong and we need to fix it,
hence the question. I will call the RW office tomorrow and ask them to check
their bound copies.

 

But thanks to all for trying to help.

 

Bill H

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20230724/9332e1cb/attachment.htm>