[Bell Historians] Pages from RW editions

[Andrew Aspland]

| 1976 |   Vol. XLIV | 18 February 1949 | 77 | 88 | 
 |
| 1977  |  Vol. XLIV | 25 February 1949 | 77 | 88 | 
 |

These two 12 page issues both had the same page numbering.
Andrew
    On Monday, 24 July 2023 at 16:50:41 BST, bill at hibberts.co.uk <bill at hibberts.co.uk> wrote:  
 
 
I have been provided with further clarification and I now understand what are the correct pages for each edition. I had assumed that the pages in the bellboard PDFs were a scanning error, I now realise the error is in the printed copies, to which respondents were referring. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

  

Regards,

  

Bill H

  

From: bill at hibberts.co.uk <bill at hibberts.co.uk> 
Sent: 23 July 2023 21:31
To: 'bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk' <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Pages from RW editions

  

Thanks to all who replied to this. Unfortunately I infer from the replies that they were based on the copies on bellboard (or maybe the CCCBR CD), not actual printed copies. The data in bellboard is wrong and we need to fix it, hence the question. I will call the RW office tomorrow and ask them to check their bound copies.

  

But thanks to all for trying to help.

  

Bill H

  
_______________________________________________
Bell-historians mailing list
Bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk
https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20230724/42b1265a/attachment.htm>