[Bell Historians] Peal discrepancy

[Erin Caters]

The peal board is on the bellboard link I gave

On Wed, 9 Sept 2026 at 21:51, oliver Lee via Bell-historians <
bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk> wrote:

> It gives me no pleasure in saying this but towards the end of it's life
> the Bell News became very unreliable when publishing peals and quarters, in
> many cases some were sent in long after the deadline but in many cases they
> sometimes misprinted peals but in this case it could be that the peal is
> wrong and not the printed reference. As I haven't seen the board In
> question I unfortunately cannot comment
> Oliver lee
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Bell-historians <bell-historians-bounces at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
> on behalf of Erin Caters via Bell-historians <
> bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 09, 2026 21:43
> *To:* bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk <
> bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
> *Cc:* Erin Caters <erincaters at googlemail.com>
> *Subject:* [Bell Historians] Peal discrepancy
>
> I've just added a peal board photo to BellBoard for St Andrew's Rugby. The
> peal board gives the date as Saturday February 18th 1911, and
> Belll News 1509:678 (Mar4th)  and Felstead give it as Wednesday January
> 18th 1911. Has this been noticed before and if so which has been accepted
> as the correct date?
> https://bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=2007214
>
> Sue M
> _______________________________________________
> Bell-historians mailing list
> Bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk
> https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20260910/1e199fd4/attachment.htm>