[Bell Historians] Navestock, Essex

[Richard Bimson]

For the dating of the belfry timbers see the VAG's dendrochronology database

https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/vag_dendro/full_record.cfm?id=1153

Richard
________________________________
From: Bell-historians <bell-historians-bounces at lists.ringingworld.co.uk> on behalf of Richard Smith via Bell-historians <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2026 9:24:28 pm
To: bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk <bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk>
Cc: Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com>
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Navestock, Essex


On Fri 18 Sept 2026 17:05, David Sloman via Bell-historians wrote:

> The old bell frame should still exist, it was at The Passmore Edwards
> Museum London but apparently was moved to Woodham Ferrers County Council
> Museum in the 1980's. I haven't seen it since it was removed from the
> tower.It consists of four pits with the treble hung diagonally above.
> Can't add anything about bell numbers prior to 1862.

I can't find any record of a museum in Woodham Ferrers, either now or in
the 1980s or '90s, unless it's the 'Heritage Hub' in St Mary's church
which seems to be a very new thing.

The Passmore Edwards Museum closed in 1994, so it's not going to be
possible to ask them where the frame went.  However, the bulk of its
collection went to the Newham Heritage Service.  I don't think they have
anywhere that could accommodate a large bell frame, but I would hope
they will have records showing how the collection was disbursed.  I've
sent them an enquiry.

I have found an article by Alan Dickinson on 'Timber Towers and Spires
of Romney Marsh Churches', published in the Romney Marsh Irregular (no.
38, 2011, Romney Marsh Research Trust), which refers to the bell frame
at Navestock, Essex, which it says was dated using dendrochronology to
1365–91:

https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.squarespace.com%2Fstatic%2F65df7835178a9d2b20f8d501%2Ft%2F677d05d5d35ef524cb22f48d%2F1736246746152%2Fpapers-2011-10-01-timber-towers-and-spires-of-romney-marsh-churches.pdf&data=05%7C02%7C%7C23c865fb647f4516c0ab08df17552887%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C639255326681440907%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OiycQyN8fKYxDYc%2BslbkcBHDxnvVgUl23mWsm1%2B17pU%3D&reserved=0<https://static1.squarespace.com/static/65df7835178a9d2b20f8d501/t/677d05d5d35ef524cb22f48d/1736246746152/papers-2011-10-01-timber-towers-and-spires-of-romney-marsh-churches.pdf>

Unfortunately, the article quotes no sources.

I don't know what layout the frame has, but from David Sloman's
description it sounds like a 5.7 layout, but with the diagonal central
pit raised above the lower swastika.  That's an assumption on my part,
but it seems a plausible layout for a frame of this age.

If this is correct, it suggests at least the lower/outer four pits would
be original: i.e. fourteenth century, if the dendrochronology is
correct.  This doesn't seem consistent with the two inventories quoted
by Deedes and Walters.  They are quoted more fully in 'Visitations of
churches belonging to St. Paul's cathedral in 1297 and in 1458' (1895):

* In 1297, 'Campanarium bonum bene opertum cum ij campanis sufficienter
cordatis' – a good bell tower, well roofed, with two bells and
sufficient ropes' – and later on, 'Item iiij campanule pro mortuis' –
'four small bells for the dead'.

* In 1458, 'tria tintunabula, due campane manuales, tres campane in
campanile insimul concordantes, cum vno sanctus bello' – three little
bells, two handbells, three bells in the bell tower harmonising with
each other, with one sanctus bell [p.67].

This suggests two bells in 1297 and three by 1458.

Of course, if the frame layout is not a two-layer variant of 5.7, that
would perhaps make it more likely that it had been extended from a
three-bell layout.

However, my primary interest is how many bells there were immediately
before 1862, rather than in mediaeval times.

RAS

_______________________________________________
Bell-historians mailing list
Bell-historians at lists.ringingworld.co.uk
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ringingworld.co.uk%2Flistinfo%2Fbell-historians&data=05%7C02%7C%7C23c865fb647f4516c0ab08df17552887%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C639255326681468671%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Ss8CACPctpc3xy6RpTZdStUrmsE36NU8%2BnmzUtFANY4%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/listinfo/bell-historians>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20260920/602f6670/attachment.htm>