[r-t] Re: Extension exceptions

Graham John graham at changeringing.co.uk
Sun Nov 7 12:16:44 UTC 2004

Robin wrote:

> Glasgow('46)/Clyde('66)/Strathclyde('71) - extension EEF/SHI. There
> are two things to remember. Firstly, the decision was not binding
> and early versions of the decisions required conservation of pivot
> bells or, at least, pivot bell relationships. Depending upon when
> these aspects were changed, some sense of the reason here can be
> found. (Can anyone give dates for this?)

But it doesn't help decide the name of the extension to Fourteen or Sixteen,
does it? Should it be Glasgow, Clyde, or Strathcylde?


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list