[r-t] Re: Extension exceptions

[Graham John]

Robin wrote:

> Glasgow('46)/Clyde('66)/Strathclyde('71) - extension EEF/SHI. There
> are two things to remember. Firstly, the decision was not binding
> and early versions of the decisions required conservation of pivot
> bells or, at least, pivot bell relationships. Depending upon when
> these aspects were changed, some sense of the reason here can be
> found. (Can anyone give dates for this?)

But it doesn't help decide the name of the extension to Fourteen or Sixteen,
does it? Should it be Glasgow, Clyde, or Strathcylde?

Graham