[r-t] 87s (2-bell runs!)

Alexander Holroyd holroyd at math.ubc.ca
Wed Sep 1 23:08:52 UTC 2004

> > It's a shame about the 87s (mine have too at present), but
> > I suppose you could avoid them with a 23456 single.
> Eh? It's the 21st Century, Ander! For me, 87s are the high point of many
> compositions - Don M's cyclic 23-spliced for instance.

Er, I assume this is intended to be tongue-in-cheek - I don't think the
87s are intended to be the main selling point of Don's comp...

21st century or not, I think most people would agree they are best avoided
(with the possible exception of 6587s and the accompanying hs rollups).

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list