[r-t] Hudson stuff

[Philip Saddleton]

Alexander Holroyd <holroyd at math.ubc.ca> wrote at 12:28:36 on Mon, 13 Sep 
2004
>No-one seems to have used the Hudson group the other way round, with 
>the group forming the plain course (for all other worthwhile groups it 
>does seem to have been done).

Really? I'd have thought that most worthwhile groups couldn't be 
generated from changes - or are you restricting yourself to those that 
can?

-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/