[r-t] Extents of Stedman Cinques

[Philip Saddleton]

Richard Smith <richard at ex-parrot.com> wrote at 21:21:30 on Thu, 16 Sep 
2004
>It's not inconceivable that a 7920-part extent of bobs-only Stedman 
>Cinques exists on this plan.  But I guess a 39,916,800 is probably 
>longer even than the Cambridge handbell bell are willing to ring!

I'm not sure about bobs-only, but it does seem the best candidate for an 
equivalent to the 60-course peals of Triples, and a way to get an extent 
with conventional calls.


-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/