[r-t] What's the meaning of a method having a particular falsecourse head

[Richard Smith]

Fielding Ian wrote:

> I guess we can do away with "cps" then!

;-)

Well, "CPS" covers a whole multitude of sins.  From methods
with minimal falsness (like Derwent with just a falseness),
through the likes of Bristol (c), and Double Dublin (ac) to
the really-quite-false

  &-56-1-5.2.36-4-3.456-36.7,2

with abcdef falseness.  And that's without mentioning X, Y
and Z falseness.

Richard