[r-t] What's the meaning of a method having aparticularfalsecourse head

[Fielding Ian]

Tin Surprise being another method - SN falseness

-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net]On Behalf Of Philip Earis
Sent: 22 April 2005 20:42
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] What's the meaning of a method having
aparticularfalsecourse head


Don:

> Is it possible to have a method with only false course heads C, P and S? 
> Ideally only those (well, also including A, depending upon your labeling 
> proclivities), though I suspect that might be impossible in a treble 
> dodging method. Perhaps it could be done in an alliance method, though?

You're one step behind the game, Don! 'True' surprise method was first rung 
in 1999.  It's notation is &56-3.6-5-6-234-25-6.34.1 (mx) and has falseness 
ACPSad.  It's a Martin Turner method (he's the same guy who wanted a method 
with CRU falseness). Along with Roald Dahl surprise, it's one of the only 
methods whose name refers to its falseness properties.



_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net