[r-t] What's the meaning of a method having aparticularfalsecourse head
I.Fielding at rbht.nhs.uk
Mon Apr 25 08:06:56 UTC 2005
Tin Surprise being another method - SN falseness
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net]On Behalf Of Philip Earis
Sent: 22 April 2005 20:42
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] What's the meaning of a method having
> Is it possible to have a method with only false course heads C, P and S?
> Ideally only those (well, also including A, depending upon your labeling
> proclivities), though I suspect that might be impossible in a treble
> dodging method. Perhaps it could be done in an alliance method, though?
You're one step behind the game, Don! 'True' surprise method was first rung
in 1999. It's notation is &56-3.6-5-6-234-25-6.34.1 (mx) and has falseness
ACPSad. It's a Martin Turner method (he's the same guy who wanted a method
with CRU falseness). Along with Roald Dahl surprise, it's one of the only
methods whose name refers to its falseness properties.
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
More information about the ringing-theory