[r-t] What's the meaning of a method having aparticularfalsecoursehead

[Fielding Ian]

The group of 60 (or 120 which were defined later by Roger Baldwin) false course heads were put together to define and group tenors together internal falseness. Using group A on its own, in isolation to define the external false course head serves no purpose and is using it out of its original context. 

I can't see any logical reason for labeling a fact as simple as :

"If you ring the lead end 12345678 in a given method it will be false against the lead end 12345678". 

I can however see it being very misleading to apply it to the external false course when you might also have internal A falseness as well. How do you then differentiate the two? 

The argument you use, Richard may be consistent - but it is also defining for definitions sake rather than serving any useful purpose.

Glint



_______________________________________________
ringing-theory mailing list
ringing-theory at bellringers.net
http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net