[r-t] Three consecutive blows

[Graham John]

PJE wrote:

 

> So what's stopping this taking off, people?

 

You are right Philip. It is surprising that methods with three blows haven't
been explored on higher numbers. They can still be dynamic and have features
not seen in other methods. I posted a simple one of these to change-ringers
in 1998. It was a Double Surprise method with wrong places, yet no wrong
hunting or wrong dodging. BUc falseness is the only drawback. 

 

b x38.34.14x58.56.36.34.14x58.56.16x78

 

http://www.boojum.org.uk/cgi-bin/line.pl?bells=8
<http://www.boojum.org.uk/cgi-bin/line.pl?bells=8&pn=%26x38.34.14x58.56.36.3
4.14x58.56.16x78%2C2&title=Unrung%20Surprise%20Major%20(3%20Blows)&lines=1&l
ine=2&line1=h&line1c=red&line1w=1%2F4%20pt&line2=v&line2w=1%20pt&style=1&pla
ce-bellsx=on&action.x=1>
&pn=%26x38.34.14x58.56.36.34.14x58.56.16x78%2C2&title=Unrung%20Surprise%20Ma
jor%20(3%20Blows)&lines=1&line=2&line1=h&line1c=red&line1w=1%2F4%20pt&line2=
v&line2w=1%20pt&style=1&place-bellsx=on&action.x=1

 

Graham

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20051204/e3facccd/attachment-0004.html>