[r-t] Various replies

[Robin Woolley]

Looking through previous postings, I see that David Sullivan has had no
reply as yet.

He said ".. the most obvious difference between (Lincolnshire) royal and
major is that in the royal working bells on the front dodging together are
coursing pairs (except for the dodge nearest the lead head/end). Is this
feature taken account of at all when considering method extension ...?" No!

Clarrie said "Do names matter?  Surely it's the grid that counts...?" How do
you denote the grids? I only ask since these have never been defined anyway.
(cf Clarrie of Thu Sep 16 @ 20:05). I bet they'll be given names sooner or
later.

Finally, looking at Richard Smith's two files, one thing leaps off the page.
Double methods need no longer be double! How does the Exercise at large feel
about this?

Best wishes
Robin