[r-t] Various replies

[Philip Saddleton]

Robin Woolley said  on 15/01/2005 12:46:

>Finally, looking at Richard Smith's two files, one thing leaps off the page.
>Double methods need no longer be double! How does the Exercise at large feel
>about this?
>  
>
A bug in Richard's software, presumably?

There's another one: some extensions by four stages are equivalent to 
those by two, in particular where there is plain hunting below the treble.

-- 
Regards
Philip
http://www.saddleton.freeuk.com/