[r-t] Reverse methods

[Fred Bone]

On 4 Aug 2006 at 21:05, Graham John said:

> Fred wrote:
> 
> > There's nothing in the Decisions to prevent you from doing so.
> > Indeed, there's nothing in the Decisions to prevent you from
> > calling some new method "Reverse Yorkshire", or something
> > equally misleading.
> 
> Except, of course, that Reverse Yorkshire has already been named for the
> genuine article.

Details, details ...