[r-t] Changes to decisions again

[Hayden Charles]

Graham John wrote on 22/01/2006 22:27:
> If the peal decisions are changed to accept
> partial extents, then the decisions could equally be applied to
> quarterpeals.

What would be the reason for that? Surely the whole point about the 
decisions is to define requirements for peals which can then be recorded 
in the CC's analysis. As the CC does not analyse or keep records of 
shorter lengths there is no requirement for them to be 'accepted' in the 
way that peals are.

I thought that Phil's aim was to lighten the load of 'regulation', not 
make it more extensive.

Hayden Charles


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.21/236 - Release Date: 20/01/2006