[r-t] Changes to decisions again

Ben Willetts ben at benjw.org.uk
Mon Jan 23 02:18:19 UTC 2006

Graham John:
> My point here was that the majority of quarterpealers accept partial
> extents to achieve a shorter length, although there may be some that
> believe you should ring a 1440 of Minor.

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood.  Yes, I quite agree that the (vast) majority of
quarter-peal ringers would accept something less than a 1440 of Minor -- or
any QP length at all of Triples.

I thought you were referring to 1260 vs. 1250 for Doubles, Minor and
Triples, and I would have thought that there is not a clear majority in
favour of the shorter length in those cases.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list