[r-t] Changes to decisions again

Barriehen at aol.com Barriehen at aol.com
Mon Jan 23 16:47:49 UTC 2006

In a message dated 23/01/2006 15:00:49 GMT Standard Time,  
richard at ex-parrot.com writes:

>  First peal of London Surprise Major in hand was 26/1/1904.  Maybe
>  cylindrical is nearer than we think.

That was partly my point.  As  I understand it (though
accounts do vary), when peal was rung, it was  widely
considered to be a hoax (despite having been  indepedently
umpired) as the method was considered to be too  complicated
for it to have been anything else.

I was only being smart alec!   But it is recorded on the CCCBR  website for 
methods so wether it was a hoax or not its down as a record.
I've just looked at the line for Rigel and I think that might be a hoax as  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20060123/420d9c44/attachment-0004.html>

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list