[r-t] Changes to decisions again
Barriehen at aol.com
Barriehen at aol.com
Mon Jan 23 16:47:49 UTC 2006
In a message dated 23/01/2006 15:00:49 GMT Standard Time,
richard at ex-parrot.com writes:
> First peal of London Surprise Major in hand was 26/1/1904. Maybe
> cylindrical is nearer than we think.
That was partly my point. As I understand it (though
accounts do vary), when peal was rung, it was widely
considered to be a hoax (despite having been indepedently
umpired) as the method was considered to be too complicated
for it to have been anything else.
I was only being smart alec! But it is recorded on the CCCBR website for
methods so wether it was a hoax or not its down as a record.
I've just looked at the line for Rigel and I think that might be a hoax as
well!
Barrie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20060123/420d9c44/attachment-0004.html>
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list