[r-t] Changes to decisions again

Stephen Penney stephen at ucalegon.com
Tue Jan 24 12:15:03 UTC 2006

MBD: "And it's worse than that - even if a method is "allowed" by the 
MC, we have to put up with their bizarre and unnatural classification 
system (e.g. "differential hunters" - and don't say they're an oddity 
because lots of Doubles ringers ring them now!)."

I really don't have a problem with this, providing the decisions are 
reasonably comprehensible so that if I ring something I can see which 
category it will fal in to. 
The biggest problem in my opinion is that if I ring something that 
doesn't fall into any of their categories then I'm told that I haven't 
rung a peal (Due to D.A.11). What I'd want is for the methods committee 
to invent me a new category which they feel is appropriate, hopefully 
after consulting me on how the method was rung and how other similar 
methods might look in the future.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list