[r-t] Change Proposal to CC Decisions - on peal lengths
dfm at mv.com
Sat Jun 24 00:42:45 UTC 2006
On 6/23/06 7:32 PM, Graham John wrote:
> *If you support the amendments, please let the list (or me if you are shy)
I am wholeheartedly in support of the intent of all your proposed
changes, including the reduction of a peal length to 5,000 in all cases.
I don't know whether or not the proposed wording is exactly right. I
leave it to those smarter than I to point out any improvements that
might be made.
While harder to pin down in detail, I think I would be even more in
favour of a more radical change, as Philip E has argued for. But short
of that, I do think your proposals are an improvement on the status quo.
BTW, why do the Decisions (your version just copies the current ones)
say "true changes" -- wouldn't it be more precise to say "distinct rows"?
Don Morrison <dfm at mv.com>
"For every thousand hacking at the leaves of evil, there is one
striking at the root." -- Henry David Thoreau
More information about the ringing-theory