[r-t] Cambridge S Minor

[edward martin]

I'm afraid that this brings up (for me) an old chestnut:
Please consider the following:
Plain lead:
12345
21435
24153
42513
45231
54321
53412
35142
31524
13542
15324

Tony Smith maintains that this is merely Grandsire but with 3 as the
primary hunt & 1 as the secondary hunt; However, I maintain that if :
Bobbed lead:
12345
21354
23145
32415
34251
43521
45312
54132
51423
15432
14523
Then clearly it is NOT !

(I bring this up about every 5 years or so, to no avail)

mew


On 10/9/06, Ben Willetts <ben at benjw.org.uk> wrote:
> Julian Parker:
> > This triggered off in my mind whether you can legally
> > ring an extent of Cambridge, starting and finishing
> > with the treble snap
>
> Yes -- this is entirely legal.  The CC Decisions say that starting a method
> from somewhere other than the lead-head does not make it a new method.
> Peals of Stedman commonly start from places other than the usual one.
>
> > and whether you could apply this to any treble bob
> > method.
>
> Yes, of course.  You can apply it to any change of any method, if you don't
> mind the treble not being the hunt-bell.
>
> Ben
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>