[r-t] Calling Positions
roddy.horton at blueyonder.co.uk
Mon Oct 16 17:09:11 UTC 2006
I have to confess to agreeing with part of Philip's posting on this. The
part I agree with being
> I can see no justification for your suggestion. I think it would cause
> confusion, with conferring any benefit. A calling position such as 7ths
> or 9ths is unambiguous; your system is not.
assuming, that is, that the word 'without' can be substituted for 'with'.
I don't agree with the idea that calling positions signify coursing orders
More information about the ringing-theory