[r-t] Stedman Doubles derivative

Sun Feb 11 11:45:45 UTC 2007

I've been on Visual Method Archive.  I am not used to MicroSyril notation,
so I've just written it out longhand:

3.5.1.3.5.3.5.3.1.5.3.1  The single can go in at the first six.

VMA says its unrung.

It does not seem to be listed on http://www.methods.org.uk in Principles
Doubles.

It looks a bit like Reverse Stedman and has some similarity to Carter.

I'll try the webmaster.

Thanks

Graham

On Sun, 11 February, 2007 11:52 am, Alexander pool wrote:
> Have you tried: http://www.methods.org.uk/ if not then try there, and
> after that contact the webmaster, he's incredibly helpful, and will be
> able to tell you if it's been rung before.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> From: grahamfeeney at bulldoghome.com
> Reply-To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> Subject: [r-t] Stedman Doubles derivative
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 11:35:45 -0000 (UTC)
>
>
> Hello All
>
>
> I've been playing with Abel and whilst trying to get the place notation
> for Reverse Stedman in, I accidentally wound up with a slightly different
> principle:
>
>
> 1z &3.5.1.3.5.3
>
>
> This is not the same as Reverse Stedman Doubles as the 'lead end' is 1.
> I've been able to give it a single (123) and can get a true 120 using
> Stedman 120 (1/5) as given in Abel.
>
>
> I cannot find a match for this in the archives and our local expert
> thought that it was worth putting out to ask opinions about whether the
> principle is unrung.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Graham Feeney, Cardiff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile.
> http://www.msn.txt4content.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list ringing-theory at bellringers.net
> http://bellringers.net/mailman/listinfo/ringing-theory_bellringers.net
>
>