[r-t] Stedman Doubles derivative

[rchat]

Graham,

It is Carter Doubles:

Carter: 5.3.1.3.5.1.3.5.3.5.3.1.5.3.1.3.5.1.3.5.3.5.3.1.
Yours :       3.5.1.3.5.3.5.3.1.5.3.1

Just starting from a different place (2 divisions of Carter given above)

Regards

Richard



-----Original Message-----
From: ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net
[mailto:ringing-theory-bounces at bellringers.net] On Behalf Of
grahamfeeney at bulldoghome.com
Sent: 11 February 2007 11:46
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] Stedman Doubles derivative


I've been on Visual Method Archive.  I am not used to MicroSyril notation,
so I've just written it out longhand:

3.5.1.3.5.3.5.3.1.5.3.1  The single can go in at the first six.

VMA says its unrung.

It does not seem to be listed on http://www.methods.org.uk in Principles
Doubles.

It looks a bit like Reverse Stedman and has some similarity to Carter.

I'll try the webmaster.

Thanks

Graham