[r-t] Singles

Robert Lee rlee5040 at yahoo.com
Fri Jan 5 13:13:20 UTC 2007

Thanks for your responses.
  There doesn't appear to be a logical reason why they can't be treated the same as 4, 5 or 6
  bell peals - I can only assume the lower bound was set at 4 due to peals of Singles never 
  being rung at the time. If people want to ring them, I don't see a problem with classifying them.

 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20070105/4fc3003f/attachment-0004.html>

More information about the ringing-theory mailing list