robin at robinw.org.uk
Mon Jun 25 06:53:34 UTC 2007
I have found it.
The article in question appears at RW73/583 (20th July) and confirms, in
general terms, that my re-construction was correct. The only further points
of significance are that Tony starts from 11111111, not 00000000, but he
remarks that the right-most digit is always 0.
It is most curious that I bothered to keep a copy of the article, as I
couldn't ring evern the treble to a touch of PB5 at the time.
More information about the ringing-theory