[r-t] Stedman problem
Earisp at rsc.org
Tue Nov 20 13:59:16 UTC 2007
Many thanks for the solutions from Percy, David and PABS. The suggestion
that PABS gives is too efficient though - I would like it to be at least
210 changes though! Can you modify it, Philip?
From: Philip Saddleton [mailto:pabs at cantab.net]
Sent: 19 November 2007 18:49
To: ringing-theory at bellringers.net
Subject: Re: [r-t] Stedman problem
9E705836421 2.4.6s.8s.10.11.12.13 (14)
197E5264830 22.214.171.124.126.96.36.199.14s (16)
Start from rounds as the third row of a slow six
This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of the addressee only and may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material. It may not be relied upon or disclosed to any other person without the consent of the RSC. If you have received it in error, please contact us immediately. Any advice given by the RSC has been carefully formulated but is necessarily based on the information available, and the RSC cannot be held responsible for accuracy or completeness. In this respect, the RSC owes no duty of care and shall not be liable for any resulting damage or loss. The RSC acknowledges that a disclaimer cannot restrict liability at law for personal injury or death arising through a finding of negligence. The RSC does not warrant that its emails or attachments are Virus-free: Please rely on your own screening.
More information about the ringing-theory