[r-t] Fwd: FW: Proposed definition of a peal

[Ted Steele]

Don Morrison wrote:
>
> I think we may need to tighten this definition up a little bit for things
> like Spliced Bristol Maximus and Stedman Cinques, which I am interpreting to
> be a piece of change ringing of multiple stages.  ....... In this case we really need to define the Stedman as a
> maximus method and have the cover bell as part of the method ...!
>
>   
There is surely no need to. Is it not sufficient to say that "For the 
purpose of determining the truth of compositions of mixed odd and even 
bell methods every row shall be considered in its entirety, that is 
including any cover bells and no such row shall be repeated?"

Ted